Check it out: http://www.buzzardproducts.com
I know, it sounds crazy to have only 100 lines of html, but in this website, almost everything s a div. If you subtract the very basic page tags that every website has, there are only 59 lines of html.
I used smushit.com to get the pngs as small as possible, the W3c validator to ensure xhtml compatibility, and i threw in google tracking, which of course ruins the validation, but i wanted it.
I even created "shams" or what I call the scenario where you load in a lower resolution graphic for the main page (say 40k), and while the page is loading you load the higher res.
There is still too much waiting in my mind for non-cache users. Most of the waiting is for the images to load. I still have some logic to do in order to make this faster and smarter, but the difference here is in the style of loading. Like i said this website has no screen refreshes. I have to load everything at once... well, kind of. I have to load only what I need at first, then intelligently load the rest.
The actual code ratio in this case was 1,000 :: 380 :: 73
It is superfast in Chrome 1.0 and Safari 4, fast in Opera 9.6, Safari 3, IE 8, and moderately fast in firefox 3, IE7
I do not support ie6, and I did not test it in Firefox 2.0, Opera 9.5, Chrome 2.0 or other browsers yet.
The worst offender as usual was ie7. It created nasty artifacts using mooTools 1.2 effects to change opacity. It also is very slow anywhere opacity or transition effects are invoked. It also has a slower load perception since it has a different rendering scheme than firefox or safari.